Standard Protocol
Paper fibre recovery evaluation establishes the technical feasibility of repulping cellulose materials within industrial recycling chains. The cepi recyclability test method version 2 provides a harmonised framework for assessing how effectively a substrate breaks down into constituent fibres during controlled laboratory disintegration. Mills utilize this procedure to quantify the yield of usable pulp while identifying contaminants that survive the process.
Achieving a high recovery score requires the removal of coatings, inks, and adhesives that would otherwise interfere with the stability of the final recycled sheet. Success depends on the ability of the material to disintegrate within a defined time frame under conditions simulating standard industrial equipment.
Evaluation Metric
Detailed measurement of the mass balance determines the final recyclability outcome through the comparison of input weight against dry fibre recovery. Researchers apply mechanical agitation to samples in water, followed by screen filtration to capture non-dispersible fractions such as plastics or heavy adhesives. The testing protocol tracks every mass fraction lost during the pulping stage to identify the presence of materials that resist degradation.
High rates of reject formation indicate poor compatibility with conventional mill infrastructure. Operators calibrate the disintegration energy to align with specific paper grades to maintain consistency across varying production runs. Clear evidence of fibre loss versus material removal provides a baseline for quantifying the environmental impact of composite structures in paper packaging.
Operational Boundary
Performance standards focus exclusively on the physical separation of cellulose from auxiliary components rather than the chemical composition of recovered pulp. Constraints exist within the protocol regarding the scale of the sample size and the specific temperatures required for agitation. Variations in water chemistry or mechanical shear forces alter the results because the method assumes a stable, controlled laboratory environment.
Broad industry adoption relies on the consistency of the classification system when applied to diverse board thicknesses and laminated finishes. Data derived from this method establishes the upper limit for circularity in paper manufacturing.